|
Post by ed alger on Sept 6, 2014 13:10:24 GMT -5
What do you like to use in a Thumbler with corn cob for polish? I'm looking for ideas for a polish that won't affect the rubber seal material? Ed...
|
|
|
Post by springfieldxdm on Sept 6, 2014 13:39:24 GMT -5
I have used the Frankfort Arsenal Brass Polish in mine a time or three without any problems. It will make a nasty mess when you switch back to wet tumbling, or at least mine did. A film appeared over all the water and brass and tub, took about 2 cycles to get rid of it. Vowed after that I was going to buy an extra drum set up so I wouldn't have to go back and forth. I never did, and just use my cheap lyman tumbler instead now. That rubber is pretty tough and not a lot of stuff is going to bother it.
|
|
|
Post by krwada on Sept 6, 2014 16:37:58 GMT -5
I use either the pre-treated Lyman corn cob media or treat the plain corn cob with Flitz.
Both work extremely well.
|
|
gws
Member
Posts: 969
Location: NW New Mexico
|
Post by gws on Sept 6, 2014 22:01:11 GMT -5
Corncob in a Thumblers? No, I use stainless steel media in warm water, Dawn Detergent, and Lemishine in that. In my Lyman vibrator, I use Dillon's polish......the only Dillon product I have. Not that it's inherently better than anything else, (it does work really well) it's just that the local fun store had it for sale at a good price. I add my brass to the corncob, and a capful of polish, turn it on and go to work. Timer turns it off in 5 hours and its bling time. My corncob source is the 20/40 blasting media at Zoro Tools. 40lb sack for $25....free shipping.
|
|
|
Post by ed alger on Sept 6, 2014 23:25:11 GMT -5
Thanks all for the replies. I've ordered some Flitz to give that a try; I'll report back. Ed... PS: I have been using Frankfort Arsenal Brass Polish and it works OK.
|
|
dangun
Member
I love the smell of burnt gun powder.
Posts: 517
Location: SW Florida
|
Post by dangun on Sept 8, 2014 10:25:56 GMT -5
Ed I also use the Dillon polish when needed. Most of the time I just use plain corn cob no polish added.
|
|
bob
Member
I'm too old to be nice but never too old to learn!
Posts: 1,457
Location: Northern California
|
Post by bob on Sept 8, 2014 12:04:09 GMT -5
Ed, I also use corn cob but the Lyman product with no aditive just the drier sheet. How clean is clean, and factory new is shiny enough for me.
|
|
|
Post by ed alger on Sept 11, 2014 11:53:38 GMT -5
Clean is clean for sure . I received a bottle of Flitz TA 04885 Green and charged a fresh 3 pounds of corn cob. I ran 2 small batches of brass for 2 hours each also adding a strip of drier sheet as I usually do. I think my test brass is shinier and cleaner than before (as compared to prior tumbled brass siting on my bench). My test is purely subjective and unscientific for sure! Using 1 oz of Flitz per pound of corn cob made my test cost $5.50 to charge 3 pounds of media. The Flitz instructions say to recharge with 1 cap full. (It doesn't say per pound or per tumbler full??). What I don't know is how much brass I can tumble before a recharge is needed??? In any event, the cost of having the shiniest brass is expensive . But oh wait!... I forgot! I'm not in this (hobby) to save money. Just ask my bride . ed... (Flitz TA 04885 was $13.94 delivered from Amazon for a 7.6 oz bottle. 3 / 7.6 x $13.94 = $5.50 for 3# media) (Frankford Arsenal costs about $2.06 to charge 3# of media. Is Flitz 2-1/2 times a better polish?? Just saying )
|
|
|
Post by krwada on Sept 11, 2014 15:28:18 GMT -5
Clean is clean for sure . I received a bottle of Flitz TA 04885 Green and charged a fresh 3 pounds of corn cob. I ran 2 small batches of brass for 2 hours each also adding a strip of drier sheet as I usually do. I think my test brass is shinier and cleaner than before (as compared to prior tumbled brass siting on my bench). My test is purely subjective and unscientific for sure! Using 1 oz of Flitz per pound of corn cob made my test cost $5.50 to charge 3 pounds of media. The Flitz instructions say to recharge with 1 cap full. (It doesn't say per pound or per tumbler full??). What I don't know is how much brass I can tumble before a recharge is needed??? In any event, the cost of having the shiniest brass is expensive . But oh wait!... I forgot! I'm not in this (hobby) to save money. Just ask my bride . ed... (Flitz TA 04885 was $13.94 delivered from Amazon for a 7.6 oz bottle. 3 / 7.6 x $13.94 = $5.50 for 3# media) (Frankford Arsenal costs about $2.06 to charge 3# of media. Is Flitz 2-1/2 times a better polish?? Just saying ) 1 oz of Flitz, (per bowl of media) is all you need. This amount will continue to work till your media basically becomes unusable. That is a lot of brass!!!
|
|
|
Post by ed alger on Sept 11, 2014 17:10:44 GMT -5
Thanks KR for the tip. Perhaps a cap full for recharge is all one needs then. I didn't think 1 oz of Frankford worked as well?
|
|
bob
Member
I'm too old to be nice but never too old to learn!
Posts: 1,457
Location: Northern California
|
Post by bob on Sept 11, 2014 17:44:19 GMT -5
Ed : off hisrs particular subject but while you're here, What was that plastic or was it aluminum "unistrut" channel you used for your run out gage? I would like to get some.
|
|
|
Post by krwada on Sept 11, 2014 17:51:56 GMT -5
Thanks KR for the tip. Perhaps a cap full for recharge is all one needs then. I didn't think 1 oz of Frankford worked as well? Hello Ed; The following is what I do. (I use the Lyman 1200 with auto-flo) 1. Pour the fresh media into the bowl. 2. Startup the tumbler 3. Squirt a little bit of Flitz while it is tumbling 4. Keep tumbling until well mixed. 5. Go to step #3 till I get a uniform light green color in the media At this point, the thing is fully charged up and ready to go. DO NOT ... do the following! 1. Pour fresh media AND dirty brass into the bowl 2. Squirt a big gob of Flitz into the bowl 3. Close lid and tumble for four(4) hours. I did this ... I spent the next two days picking out all of that corn-cob clogged brass with a needle. Heh!
|
|
|
Post by ed alger on Sept 11, 2014 23:49:41 GMT -5
Bob, the track is called T-Track. I use the that which is 3/4" outside and will accept a 7/16" bolt head (of a 1/4-20 bolt) inside. The Shop Fox brand is the cheapest I've found. Incra makes wider tracks to accept a T-Fence. ShopFox at Amazon
|
|
|
Post by ed alger on Sept 11, 2014 23:54:45 GMT -5
KR, thanks for the feedback. When I added the Flitz to my thumbler, I ran it for 1/2 hour and it still wasn't mixed real well.
|
|
gws
Member
Posts: 969
Location: NW New Mexico
|
Post by gws on Sept 12, 2014 1:02:19 GMT -5
Maybe it's the Flitz that doesn't mix well. Using the Dillon polish, also in a Lyman, like I said, I just add cases to my corncob and a capful of polish, and turn it on. When I come back in 4 hours the brass is perfect....not a sign of clogged flash holes.....of course I use the smaller granules called 20/40. I've just never had a problem having to dig out or media not mixing well. Suppose I was lucky to have found the Dillon polish for sale on the same shelf as the Lyman 2500 Pro Magnum the day I bought both?
|
|
poohzilla
Member
Give me a place to stand and a long-enough lever, and I will invariably break the lever.
Posts: 1,050
Location: New Hamster
|
Post by poohzilla on Sept 12, 2014 6:49:51 GMT -5
GWS- back in the other world, you turned me on to the 20/40 grit corncob. I think happy thoughts of you every time I open a tumbled batch of brass and don't have to spend hours poking media out of flash holes and primer pockets !
|
|
|
Post by ed alger on Sept 12, 2014 10:47:14 GMT -5
I've never used Dillon's polish and since GWS uses it, I thought I'd investigate . This is from Dillon's site: "Rapid Polish 290 is the first cartridge case finish designed specifically to bring a brilliant shine (20 percent brighter than tumbling media alone) and a protective coating to reloaded ammunition. Simply add several capfuls to the media in your tumbler and run. Rapid Polish 290 has a great residual value and stays in your tumbling media. You'll use less each time you clean your cases."Q: What does several capfuls mean? (1, 2, 5) Q: Using Dillon's Rapid Polish; does it require a pre-charge amount like Flitz and Frankford? Also I would suspect that nubes to reloading would think that one could tumble reloaded ammo with Dillon's polish since Dillon says it protects reloaded ammo. ed...
|
|
|
Post by springfieldxdm on Sept 12, 2014 19:49:56 GMT -5
I know you have made the comment about tumbling reloaded ammo in jest, but I have always tumbled loaded ammo as a final step with a lot of polish in walnut to help preserve shine and remove all traces of oils etc from hands. After seperating the rounds from the media I use white cotton gloves and pack it away. Several years ago after reading a post on a forum where a guy tumbled rounds for days and then weeks, then breaking them apart and looking at the grain structures on a microscope I felt better about post loaded tumbling. I will find the link if I can. I have tested my own after a control of no post loaded tumbling and some tumbled for 2 hours, over a chrono I noticed no appreciable difference. I have all the test results in an old log book, if I remember correctly I used Power Pistol and Unique in .40 s&w and Varget and Reloder 10x in .223. While I would not advised tumbling loaded competition rounds, your shtf and plinking rounds should be just fine and shiney. Not aiming to start trouble, and I know many would disagree. Just trying to explain this other path to nirvana. If the vibration and powder breakdown concerns you think of how much vibration the loaded round get being trucked to your house. If it's the loose rounds with primers exposed think how the bulk boxes of loose 500-1000 round packs of federal .223 get treated by UPS on the way to your house. Primers need a sharp hit to go off, which could never happen under ordinary situations in the tumbler. Until I have one go off in my tumbler which sits out back because of the dust, I will continue this process. I am not trying to change anyone's mind, just bring scientific reasoning to the argument. Last of all some claim that the reloading companies claim you shouldn't tumble live ammo, but remember every firearms maker claims you shouldn't shoot reload in their particular gun. On average I reload about 6-7k rounds a year this way, and for the last 12 years not had any issues. Respectfully submitted, Shelby
|
|
|
Post by springfieldxdm on Sept 12, 2014 20:06:43 GMT -5
|
|
bob
Member
I'm too old to be nice but never too old to learn!
Posts: 1,457
Location: Northern California
|
Post by bob on Sept 12, 2014 22:21:02 GMT -5
springfield....what are greater risks than tumbling a loaded round? There are none if you load by the book!!!!!!!!!!! Also your lube should be gone before the powder goes in. While tumbling you have absolutely no" ZERO" control over what may happen while during the reloading process you are in total control!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
gws
Member
Posts: 969
Location: NW New Mexico
|
Post by gws on Sept 13, 2014 0:24:03 GMT -5
I don't hesitate to clean up loaded rounds in a vibrator tumbler. Done it for 15 to 30 minutes for many years. Where did I get the idea? From ammo manufacturers......how do you think their ammo is so shiny and clean? You think they ship them to China and have peasants hand polish? If you believe that, how about buying my beach front property I have for sale here in New Mexico? This question comes up in the big forums about twice a year. Here's the latest one from AR15.com a couple of weeks agoAs for changing the structure of powder, or removing the additives that effect burn speed and flame deterrents....that isn't going to happen tumbling for hours, but why rock the boat. You only need 15 to 20 minutes.
|
|
|
Post by springfieldxdm on Sept 13, 2014 7:55:55 GMT -5
Bob, I wasn't trying to change your mind. It is an acceptable risk for me and my firearms. I feel I am in more danger walking down the street in the middle of the day, than tumbling a live rounds. My question would be what exactly are you concerned with happening (the danger factor)? I am always open to listen To concerns and try to learn something new. Thanks again Gwhis for chiming in. Sometimes it's really cold and lonely when you stand away from the pack. :-)
|
|
bob
Member
I'm too old to be nice but never too old to learn!
Posts: 1,457
Location: Northern California
|
Post by bob on Sept 13, 2014 10:04:57 GMT -5
Springfield....What caught my attention was,"reloading has enough other risks" indicating there may be an associated risk with tumbling. Since I load with a single stage press and am in no hurry I don't consider there to be any more risk than cookin' dinner. I've read and heard about tumbling loaded ammo for years the only concern I have it is the only process which I have no control of the individual cartridge for what ever period of time. Part of my concern may have originated from old wives tales though common sense says there should be no degradation of a propperly loaded cartridge and one cartridge having enough energy to hit another and cause a problem is nil. In fairness to you I also failed to carefully read your first post whch describes a well thought out process. Bob
|
|
|
Post by springfieldxdm on Sept 13, 2014 14:02:36 GMT -5
No sweat, I am not the most elegant with words. Combine that with typing on an iPad and sometime it gets even worse. I do my reloading on a progressive for all plinking rounds, I use a turrent for working up new loads and only use a single stage for my hunting or accuracy rounds. On the progressive I use imperial sizing was on all cases. I get a good coat on my hand and stick my hand in the bin to coat them all. This leaves a lubed up mess on the outside of the cases, which does attract dirt etc when out at the range or at an event. That is why I started tumbling live rounds, the extra bling was a bonus. As a handloader, we all take pride in our finished product and the shine is part of it for me.
The extra dangers I was referring to typically occur on a progressive system which is why most run powder lock out dies, low primer sensors, and the like. You are correct when loading on a single stage that you are in charge of every step, but what happens when you get distracted or in a hurry. The only problem I have ever had to this point (knock on wood) was when I was reloading .40 on a single stage. I forgot to charge a row of 5 cartridges with powder and had my first squib load in competition (I was in a hurry finishing them up the night before). That's what I was meaning about risks.
|
|
jbnut
Member
Posts: 169
Location: Warren, Pennsylvania
|
Post by jbnut on Sept 13, 2014 20:24:04 GMT -5
I know you have made the comment about tumbling reloaded ammo in jest, but I have always tumbled loaded ammo as a final step with a lot of polish in walnut to help preserve shine and remove all traces of oils etc from hands. After seperating the rounds from the media I use white cotton gloves and pack it away. Several years ago after reading a post on a forum where a guy tumbled rounds for days and then weeks, then breaking them apart and looking at the grain structures on a microscope I felt better about post loaded tumbling. I will find the link if I can. I have tested my own after a control of no post loaded tumbling and some tumbled for 2 hours, over a chrono I noticed no appreciable difference. I have all the test results in an old log book, if I remember correctly I used Power Pistol and Unique in .40 s&w and Varget and Reloder 10x in .223. While I would not advised tumbling loaded competition rounds, your shtf and plinking rounds should be just fine and shiney. Not aiming to start trouble, and I know many would disagree. Just trying to explain this other path to nirvana. If the vibration and powder breakdown concerns you think of how much vibration the loaded round get being trucked to your house. If it's the loose rounds with primers exposed think how the bulk boxes of loose 500-1000 round packs of federal .223 get treated by UPS on the way to your house. Primers need a sharp hit to go off, which could never happen under ordinary situations in the tumbler. Until I have one go off in my tumbler which sits out back because of the dust, I will continue this process. I am not trying to change anyone's mind, just bring scientific reasoning to the argument. Last of all some claim that the reloading companies claim you shouldn't tumble live ammo, but remember every firearms maker claims you shouldn't shoot reload in their particular gun. On average I reload about 6-7k rounds a year this way, and for the last 12 years not had any issues. Respectfully submitted, Shelby I believe Dan did some tests on this subject back at the "Old Home" and had posted a video with his results. If I remember correctly some powders did show some "Break down" and others did not show any change. The video of his burn test is what surprised me, I thought the powder that did break down would burn faster but that was not the case.
|
|
|
Post by springfieldxdm on Sept 13, 2014 20:35:29 GMT -5
I only observed at the "old place" and I don't remember seeing it. Dan if you read this and still have all the old info could you post it somewhere. I'd love to take a look at it. I feel bad as we have now completely high jacked this thread :-)
|
|
|
Post by ed alger on Sept 22, 2014 21:03:08 GMT -5
I never did get my question answered before this thread went sideways.
Anyway, this is the answer from Dillon regarding loaded ammo: FWIW
DillonHelp
To Me Today at 2:10 PM
"Absolutely. We tumble loaded ammo about 10 to 15 minutes to remove case lube."
|
|
bob
Member
I'm too old to be nice but never too old to learn!
Posts: 1,457
Location: Northern California
|
Post by bob on Sept 22, 2014 22:03:08 GMT -5
I've never had the need so I have not done it. I think it to be ,when done prudently,safe. One expert says rain the other says sunny! In regard to your original query I would try Bon Ammi or Jewelers ruge it is a dry powder. Other than that I would stay away from any amonia based polish. I don't really know what I'm talkin' 'bout tho! And many thanks for the "T" track information.
|
|
gws
Member
Posts: 969
Location: NW New Mexico
|
Post by gws on Sept 22, 2014 22:31:02 GMT -5
Ed, you're right we didn't your questions worth a darn. I don't know what they mean by several capfuls except that several is at least three. I ignore that.......I add 1 capful to my large 2500 Lyman and it works just fine. I add several 1"x1" squares cut out from dryer sheets to reduce the dust.....that also works quite well. I don't think 2 or 3 capfuls would hurt much, except to provide more chance of it not mixing with the media and sticking media to your cases. I don't know what a pre-charge amount is. If it means tumbling media and polish for a while before you add brass, then I say no. I add everything together and tumble. I don't get gunked up brass or flash holes ..... ever. I DO think the 20-40 grit size is a major reason I don't have clogged flash holes. 20-40 may require tumbling a tad longer than larger grits....I can't tell if it does, because I set the timer for 4 hours and leave. Unless the brass is tarnished gross, that's all it needs. I don't pick up gross brass....so again I can't tell how long that takes. If you want to make gross brass new again....use a Thumlers rotary, wet with stainless steel. Then you get this, no matter how stained and green your brass is:
|
|
|
Post by ed alger on Sept 22, 2014 23:15:26 GMT -5
GW, thanks for the response. Flitz has been working pretty well. I do use a piece of dryer sheet along with 20-40 corn cob media. When the Flitz is used up, I'll get some Dillon polish to try. I suppose that adding a cap full of polish at a time would avoid the clumping problem. ed...
|
|